Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Soto v. Zenk et al
as 5:2011cv00075
Petitioner:
Joel Anthony Soto
Respondent:
Michael Zenk and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Paulino v. Zenk et al
as 5:2011cv00071
Petitioner:
Juan Paulino
Respondent:
Michael Zenk and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pichardo v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2011cv00069
Petitioner:
Osiris Pichardo
Respondent:
United States Of America and Michael Zenk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jimenez v. United States of America et al
as 5:2011cv00062
Petitioner:
Jose Cruz Jimenez
Respondent:
United States of America and Michael Zenk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cazares v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv00284
Plaintiff:
Freddy Cazares
Defendant:
United States of America, Michael Zenk, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Ford v. Zenk et al
as 1:2008cv01923
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Ford
Defendant:
Michael Zenk, Carlus Worthy, Neel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. United States of America et al
as 4:2007cv00156
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morrow
Defendant:
United States of America, Michael Zenk, X. Shuman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. United States of America et al
as 1:2007cv01782
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Martin, II
Defendant:
United States of America, Michael Zenk, X. Shuman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (b) Inj or loss property, personal inj, death; US DFT
Shakur v. Zenk
as 1:2007cv01230
Petitioner:
Mutulu Shakur
Respondent:
Michael Zenk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Zenk
as 1:2007cv00992
Petitioner:
Aaron Moore
Respondent:
Michael Zenk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
