Cases 1 - 10 of 2,239
Barys v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
John Michael Barys
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of SSA Decision DIWC - Title II Worker or Child Claims
Bottom Line Driven, LLC et al v. Quinn et al
as 3:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Bottom Line Driven, LLC and Joseph DiRaffaele
Defendant:
Michael Quinn and Vanguard Dealer Services, LLC
Hines et al v. Damhas et al
as 3:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines, Shameka Hines and Telly Hines
Defendant:
Damhas, Earl Given, 915 Lafayette Blv Room 400 06604 and others
O'Connor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Michael C. O'Connor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Young v. Osborn Correctional
as 3:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Michael Young
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Padin et al
as 3:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Michael Padin and Cevat Eren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Perez v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Ometrius Perez
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Connecticut Department of Correction, Colleen Gallager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moniz v. Osborn C.I. et al
as 3:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Moniz
Defendant:
Osborn C.I. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demartino v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Michael Demartino
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
