Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mickey Group Inc v. Great Lakes Forest Products Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00534
Plaintiff:
Mickey Group Inc and Mickey Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Great Lakes Forest Products Inc, Great Lakes Lamination Inc, Mark E Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mickey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
as 2:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Kelly Mickey
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00214
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roahrig v. Siegal et al
as 3:2021cv00270
Defendant:
Jeff Siegal, Elkhart County Jail Staff on Mickey Bracketts Crew and Mickey Bracket
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Dawn Roahrig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00515
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00010
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Richie v. Wilson et al
as 2:2018cv00396
Defendant:
Kurt Wilson and K's Construction Specialist Inc
Plaintiff:
Mickey Richie
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ROBINSON v. WARDEN
as 1:2018cv00518
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
MICKEY ROBINSON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TOSTI v. BYRD et al
as 2:2017cv00449
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, SAMUEL BYRD, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
MICKEY TOSTI
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
