Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Simon et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2009cv10506
Plaintiff: Carol Simon
Defendant: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Cambridge, City of, Deval Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PRALL v. CITY OF BOSTON et al
as 1:2009cv10110
Plaintiff: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant: City of Boston, Middlesex County and UNKNOWN NAMED LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL OF BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv12103
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Silva et al v. Middlesex County et al
as 1:2008cv11863
Plaintiff: Emanuel Silva and Sean Cashman
Defendant: Middlesex County, James DiPaula, Paul Norton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tang v. Middlesex County Massachusetts et al
as 1:2008cv11779
Plaintiff: Toan Tang
Defendant: Middlesex County Massachusetts, Dennis Curran, Hamlin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Huard v. UMass Memorial Healthcare et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv10778
Plaintiff: Steven J. Huard
Defendant: UMass Memorial Healthcare, Massachusetts Department of Corrections, Middlesex County Sheriffs Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Penda v. Romeo et al.
as 1:2008cv10565
Plaintiff: Fatih Penda and Fatih Penda
Defendant: Thomas Romeo, Town of North Reading and Middlesex County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights Both
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10057
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Garfield v. Doe et al
as 1:2007cv11805
Plaintiff: Wayne P. Garfield
Defendant: John Doe, Middlesex County, James V. DiPaola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?