Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HOLMES v. TOMPKINS et al
as 4:2019cv00163
Defendant:
MIDTOWN MEDICAL CENTER, Sheriff DONNA TOMPKINS and PETTY
Plaintiff:
GARY W HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Mahone v. Medical Center
as 19-12145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS JAMES MAHONE
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDICAL CENTER, The, d.b.a. Midtown Medical Center
Tommy McNeal v. Columbus Police Department, et al
as 18-12790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY MCNEAL
Defendant - Appellee:
COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT and MIDTOWN MEDICAL CENTER
ALLIANCE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL et al v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv00972
Plaintiff:
PIEDMONT NEWNAN HOSPITAL, INC., LAKELAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., CHESAPEAKE HOSPITAL AUTHORITY and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
MCNEAL v. COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
TOMMY MCNEAL
Defendant:
COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT and MIDTOWN MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Mahone v. Midtown Medical Center, et al
as 17-14836
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS JAMES MAHONE
Defendant - Appellee:
MIDTOWN MEDICAL CENTER, DENNIS NICHOLLS, CEDRIC FOSTER, Sergeant and others
MAHONE v. MIDTOWN MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 4:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JAMES MAHONE
Defendant:
MIDTOWN MEDICAL CENTER, RYAN CHANDLER, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State Farm Mutual Auto Ins Co, et al v. Midtown Medical Center Inc, et al
as 10-4267
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INS CO and STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO.
Defendant - Appellee:
MIDTOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC, RONALD NESTEL, FRANK SOLOMON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SAMUEL FISHMAN
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. NESTEL et al
as 1:2008mc00043
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
RONALD NESTEL, SIMON FISHMAN, FRANK SOLOMON, D.O. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
