Cases 21 - 30 of 54
BARNISHIN v. MEGGS et al
as 4:2016cv00719
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BARNISHIN
Defendant:
WILLIAM N MEGGS, ELIZABETH DESLOGE, ERIN CUZZORT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. LEON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2016cv00710
Plaintiff:
TYRON WATSON
Defendant:
LEON COUNTY JAIL, MIKE WOODS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charlie Williams v. Morris Young, et al
as 16-16768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLIE J. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MORRIS A. YOUNG, MIKE WOOD and CORIZON HEALTH INC.
FAIRFAX v. WOOD et al
as 4:2016cv00526
Defendant:
MIKE WOOD , LEON COUNTY , JOHN SCHMIDT and others
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD J FAIRFAX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGarry v. Board of County Commissioners for the County of Lincoln, et al.
as 2:2016cv00483
Plaintiff:
Sean McGarry
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners for the County of Lincoln, Lincoln County Sheriff's Department, Mike Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Lagi v. Jennifer Morris, et al
as 16-11834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY JAMES LAGI
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNIFER MORRIS, Sheriff Deputy, DON ODHAM, Detective, MIKE WOOD, Leon County Sheriff and others
Hanley v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2016cv00437
Plaintiff:
Hampton Ronald Hanley
Defendant:
City of Houston , Harris County Appraisal District, Federal Emergency Management Agency and others
Creditor:
Spring Branch Independent School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00539
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
PETERSON v. WOOD
as 4:2015cv00534
Defendant:
MIKE WOOD
Plaintiff:
TOMI PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
LUMPKIN v SCHMIDT et al
as 4:2015cv00468
Plaintiff:
JYRONE LUMPKIN
Defendant:
JOHN SCHMIDT, MIKE WOODS and CHUCK DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
