Cases 1 - 10 of 715
Hunter Doster, et al v. Frank Kendall, III, et al
as 24-3404
Plaintiff:
HUNTER DOSTER, JASON ANDERSON, MCKENNA COLANTANIO and others
Defendant:
HON. FRANK KENDALL, III, In his official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force, LT. GENERAL ROBERT I. MILLER, In his official capacity as Surgeon General of the Air Force, LT. GENERAL BRIAN S. ROBINSON, In his official capacity as Commander, Air Education and Training Command and others
Marty MillerIn re: Marty Miller
as 24-1261
Petitioner:
In re: MARTY B. MILLER
Respondent:
BRYAN MORRISON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Leonel Hinojosa, Jr.
as 24-1150
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LEONEL MILLER HINOJOSA, JR.
Brockriede v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv10117
Plaintiff:
Roland-Charles: Brockriede
Defendant:
Mathew Miller, Barney Whitesman, Latchana and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Iesha Mitchell, et al v. City of Benton Harbor, MI, et al
as 23-1970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IESHA MITCHELL, Guardian and next friend of A.M., KEA N. BENNETT, Guardian and next friend of A.B. next friend of S.B., et al., CHRISTINE ANDERSON, Guardian and next friend of A.L.next friend of D.L. 1 next friend of D.L. 2 next friend of M.L. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MI, MARCUS MUHAMMAD, MICHAEL O'MALLEY and others
Capital S Investment Company Inc. et al v. Miller et al
as 1:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Capital S Investment Company Inc. and Karol Haim Schwartz
Defendant:
Director, NSC Loren K. Miller, Dir, USCIS Tracy Renaud, Sec., DHS Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
