Cases 1 - 10 of 2,151
Booth v. Miller et al
as 4:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Booth
Defendant:
Brantley Miller and Michael Ganatos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
LaGaite v. Miller et al
as 6:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Luis Santos LaGaite
Defendant:
Senior Warden Gene Miller, Asst. Warden Annette Marquez, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Palo Pinto County Conservatives et al v. Long et al
as 4:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Palo Pinto County Conservatives, Grass Roots Mineral Wells PAC and Johanna Miller
Defendant:
Shane Long, Gary Glover, Mike Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Miller v. Dunn et al
as 3:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
Bradley B Miller
Defendant:
Virginia Talley Dunn, The Hockaday School, Laura Leathers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Grasshopper, Inc et al v. Curtis et al
as 1:2024cv00382
Defendant:
Grasshopper, Inc, Miller Heather, Curtis Alexa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
