Cases 1 - 10 of 332
Smith v. Mitchell
as 4:2024cv04090
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Smith
Defendant:
Jason Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Waggoner et al
as 2:2024cv02109
Defendant:
Officer Dalton Waggoner and Barling Police Department
Plaintiff:
Cole Allen Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2024cv04064
Defendant:
John Pickett and Jason Mitchell
Plaintiff:
Randy Ellis Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vojta et al v. Evolve Bank & Trust
as 3:2024cv00136
Defendant:
Evolve Bank & Trust
Plaintiff:
Alisha Mitchell and Charles Vojta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Mitchell v. Riser Motors, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv06080
Defendant:
Paul G. Riser, Riser Motors, Inc. and Cameron N. Riser
Plaintiff:
Melissa M. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Lane v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Defendant:
Jackson, Natasha Hammock, Leavy Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Kelly et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Mark Barker
Defendant:
Morieon Kelly, D Mitchell, Scott Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Arkansas Department of Correction
as 4:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Tilon Monta Mitchell, Jr
Defendant:
Pulaski County Circuit Court and Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
