Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Langley et al v. NetJets Aviation Inc
as 3:2023cv02300
Plaintiff:
donald ross, Gregory Langley, jim mohr and others
Defendant:
NetJets Aviation, Inc. and NetJets Aviation Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Zuniga v. Parker et al
as 3:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Julio A Zuniga
Defendant:
Toney Parker, Denise Robinson, Gar Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mohr Partners Inc v. Paramski et al
as 3:2021cv02156
Plaintiff:
Mohr Partners Inc
Defendant:
Steve Paramski, Michael Morgret and Mark Urbanowicz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Paramski et al v. Mohr Partners Inc
as 3:2021cv01946
Plaintiff:
Steve Paramski, Michael Morgret and Mark Urbanowicz
Defendant:
Mohr Partners, Inc. and Mohr Partners Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Long v. Long et al
as 5:2021cv00479
Defendant:
Corporal James Plummer, Rita Kruger, Jacob Wayne Bellington and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jon Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mateen v. LNU et al
as 1:2020cv00830
Plaintiff:
Shazizz Mateen and Reginald Bowers
Defendant:
Janice LNU, Officer David Mohr, LaGrange Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohr v. Morris
as 5:2019cv00235
Plaintiff:
Alice D Mohr
Defendant:
Dr. Eugene Frances Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohr v. Lubbock Police Department et al
as 5:2019cv00236
Defendant:
Sgt. NFN Casey, Lubbock Police Department, Internal Affairs Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Alice D Mohr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Harness v. Case Commercial Real Estate Partners et al
as 3:2014cv03998
Plaintiff:
Brian Harness and Brian Harness Photography
Defendant:
Case Commercial Real Estate Partners, Coit Medical LLC, Mohr Capital LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
