Cases 1 - 10 of 107
United States of America v. Artis (Campbell)
as 24-922
Defendant:
MALIK CAMPBELL, SOLOMON ARTIS, LEONARD BARLETTO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Happy Monk LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00063
Defendant:
Chaoran Tang, Happy Monk LLC doing business as Happy Monk Club and Scott Tang
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
IN RE SHANDA GAMES LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 22-3076
Plaintiff:
Astor BK Realty Trust, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Monk
Defendant / Appellee:
Shanda Games Limited, Yingfeng Zhang, Li Yao and others
Sherman et al v Trinity Teen Solutions Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00215
Defendant:
Dally-Up LLC, Trinity Teen Solutions Inc, Judith D Jefferis and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Nash, Anna Gozun, Carlie Sherman and others
Interested Party:
United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LENTO et al v. ALTMAN et al
as 1:2022cv04840
Defendant:
THE LAW OFFICE OF KEITH ALTMAN, PLLC, KEITH ALTMAN, ESQ., K ALTMAN LAW and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D. LENTO, ESQ. and LENTO LAW FIRM, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
JOSEPH A. DICKSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America v. Artis (Passley)
as 22-1368
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Solomon Artis, AKA Light, AKA Spaz, Leonard Barletto, AKA Boots, Courtney Coy, AKA Styles and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Cordero Passley, AKA Looney
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Monk
as 21-51130
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Luciano Sanchez Monk
USA v. Marcal Fraction
as 21-2867
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCAL FRACTION, also known as Monk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
