Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Courthouse News Service v. Montgomery County Clerk of Courts
as 1:2023cv00705
Plaintiff:
Courthouse News Service
Defendant:
MIKE FOLEY, in his official capacity as Clerk of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas and Montgomery County Clerk of Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURDA v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2022cv03513
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BURDA
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JUDGE WENDY DEMCHICK-ALLOY, PRESIDENT JUDGE CAROLYN T. CARLUCCIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00504
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAGGART v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2018cv01409
Plaintiff:
KENETH TAGGART
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diane Gochin v. Richard Haaz, et al
as 17-2481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIANE R. GOCHIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE RICHARD P. HAAZ, Individually and in his Official Capacity, PAUL C. TROY, Esq., Individually and in his Capacity as Office of the Court, RANDEE FELDMAN, Esq., Individually and in her Official Capacity as an Officer of the Court and others
TRAVALINE v. TRAVALINE et al
as 2:2015cv06083
Plaintiff:
SCOTT J. TRAVALINE
Defendant:
ROBIN B. TRAVALINE, ROBERT ROSINTHAL & HARC GROUP, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3794
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
