Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Mooney v. Ashford Inc
as 3:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Sean Mooney and Jonathan Bonnette
Defendant:
Ashford, Inc. and Ashford Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Barrientos v. Stacked Logistics, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03129
Plaintiff:
Emma Barrientos
Defendant:
Stacked Logistics, Inc. and Joshua Mooney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv03126
Plaintiff:
Emma Barrientos and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Stacked Logistics, Inc. and Joshua Mooney
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Gonzales et al v. Hile et al
as 1:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Gonzales and Michele Renee Gonzales
Defendant:
Larissa M. Hile, Jenna Seeney, William Longlois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AKHTER et al v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
MOSAMMAT AKHTER, MOHAMMAD KARIM and JAWAD KARIM
Defendant:
JOHN PATRICK MOONEY, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, RICHARD ROES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Moaney v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00072
Petitioner:
Richard Daniel Mooney, IV and Richard Daniel Moaney
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mooney v. Garrido
as 4:2022cv01108
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Mooney
Respondent:
NFN Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mooney v. Garrido
as 3:2022cv02727
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Mooney
Respondent:
NFN Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mooney v. Lyft, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00893
Plaintiff:
Mallory Mooney
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mooney v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00741
Petitioner:
Richard Daniel Mooney, IV
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
