Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Payne v. Whisman et al
as 1:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Cesare Payne
Defendant:
Candace Whisman, Camala Morris, Wendy Pruett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Donald Allen, FNU Boyd, Joshua Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv02024
Plaintiff:
Henry Morris
Defendant:
Daniel J. Taylor and Spragins, Barnett, Cobb & Butler, Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Genovese
as 2:2024cv02003
Petitioner:
Curtis Morris
Respondent:
Kevin Genovese, Warden and Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv01165
Petitioner:
Adarion Morris
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Obion Co. Jail
as 1:2023cv01181
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lynn Morris
Defendant:
Obion Co. Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cormia v. Parris et al.
as 3:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Dorwin Cormia
Defendant:
Mike Parris, Elizabeth Noyem, Adam Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv01146
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Donald Allen, S Floyd, Earls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02291
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Settles v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv02277
Plaintiff:
Markelle D. Settles
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Most Staff Employed At Shelby County Jail, Sgt. Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
