Cases 21 - 30 of 303
Brittany Hyre Anculle, et al v. USA
as 22-5494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTANY N. HYRE ANCULLE, JAMES H. BARNES, LISA M. BATES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mitchell et al v. Benton Harbor, City of et al
as 1:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Iesha Mitchell, Kea N. Bennett, Christine Anderson and others
Defendant:
Benton Harbor, City of, Marcus Muhammad, Michael O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
USA v. Morris Hall, Jr.
as 22-5367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MORRIS E. HALL, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Carl MorrisIn re: Carl Morris
as 22-1208
Petitioner:
In re: CARL MORRIS, aka Carl Henry Pruitt
Respondent:
MIKE BROWN, Warden
Glenn Glatz v. Ronald Newcomb, et al
as 21-6188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLENN FRED GLATZ
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD CROCKETT NEWCOMB, DAVID B. RAUSCH, in his official capacity, EDWARD CANTRELL MILLER and others
Morris Beals, et al v. Countrymark Energy Resources,
as 21-6152
Plaintiff:
MORRIS W. BEALS and JONI BEALS
Intervenor:
CLEARPATH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and STINSON BROS. WELDING SERVICE, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTRYMARK ENERGY RESOURCES, LLC
Morris Beals, et al v. Countrymark Energy Resources,
as 21-6145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MORRIS W. BEALS and JONI BEALS
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTRYMARK ENERGY RESOURCES, LLC
Alvin Frazier v. Amy Coffelt, et al
as 21-1740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant / Appellee:
AMY COFFELT, Food Service Supervisor, KEVIN LINDSEY, Warden, D. SMITH, Deputy Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
