Cases 1 - 10 of 203
Morris v Kansas City Railway Company
as 2:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D MORRIS
Defendant:
KANSAS CITY RAILWAY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Morris v. FCI El Reno
as 4:2023cv00999
Petitioner:
Tom Morris and Tom Franklin Morris
Respondent:
FCI El Reno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morris v. Cerliano
as 6:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Anthony Norman Morris
Defendant:
Maxey Cerliano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Kia Motors Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Candice Clark Morris
Defendant:
Kia Motors Corporation, Kia America, Inc. and Graco Children's Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00244
Petitioner:
Morris Landon Johnson, II
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Director
as 6:2023cv00240
Petitioner:
Morris Landon Johnson, II
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Hyatt et al
as 6:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Todrick Morris
Defendant:
Lt Jonathan S Hyatt, Corr Officer Zachary Dennis, Derek C Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
