Cases 1 - 10 of 20
(PC) Bonilla v. England
as 2:2023cv01391
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Morrison C. England, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00356
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Easley v. Trump et al
as 5:2022cv02344
Plaintiff:
Gary D Easley
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Joseph Biden, Lucy Koh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
(PC) Steward v. Newman et al
as 2:2020cv02069
Defendant:
B. Ebert, Dale A. Drozd, Garland E Burrell and others
Plaintiff:
Donny Steward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Clay
as 4:2020cv04304
Defendant:
Michael E. Delllastrillo, Toni Cantil-Sakauye, Andrew G. Schopler and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Clay et al
as 3:2020cv03167
Defendant:
Morrison C. England, Jr., Toni Contil-Sakauye, Jeffrey W. Horner and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Clay et al
as 3:2020cv00823
Defendant:
Tani Cantril-Sakuye, Morrison C. England, Jr., Barbara McAliffe and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Molen v. United States 9th District Court et al
as 2:2017cv02224
Plaintiff:
James O. Molen
Defendant:
United States 9th District Court, Maryann Matherly, Troy L. Nunley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salma Agha-Khan, MD v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv03186
Defendant:
Kirk Edward Sherriff, Debbie Banducci, Barry L Goldner and others
Plaintiff:
Salma Agha-Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen-Todt v. England et al
as 3:2016mc01167
Plaintiff:
Larry Allen-Todt
Defendant:
Morrison C England, Jr., Benjamin B Wagner and Phillip A Talbert
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
