Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Mosley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Mosley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MOSLEY v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv00876
Petitioner:
WILLIAM MOSLEY
Respondent:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOSLEY v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00950
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and GEO GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Jay County Sheriffs Dept
as 1:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
James L Mosley
Defendant:
Jay County Sheriffs Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSLEY v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
JERRY WAYNE MOSLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 pi Federal Tort Claims Act - Personal Injury
MOSLEY v. RIPLEY COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 4:2021cv00167
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE MOSLEY
Defendant:
RIPLEY COUNTY INDIANA, INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, GEO PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSLEY v. REAVES et al
as 1:2021cv02058
Petitioner:
JAMES L. MOSLEY
Respondent:
ANGELA REAVES and RYAN KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOSLEY v. SEVIER
as 1:2021cv01980
Petitioner:
JOHN A. MOSLEY
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pratt v. Society et al
as 3:2021cv00310
Defendant:
LaPorte County Metro Operations, LaPorte City Police Department, Nigel Albaneze and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Omar Pratt, Jr, Rev Robert O Pratt, Jr and Robert Omer Pratt, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSLEY v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2021cv00072
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
GARRY MOSLEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
