Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Anthony Givens, et al v. Muriel Bowser, et al
as 23-7042
Plaintiff / Appellant: Anthony D. Givens, Deborah R. Bowser and Eugene P. Givens, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee: Muriel Bowser, in her official capacity as Mayor, Washington, D.C., Laura Green Zeilinger, in her official capacity as Commissioner, District of Columbia Department of Human Services, Wayne Turnage, MPA, in his official as Director, District of Columbia Department of Health Care Finance and others
Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers, et al v. PRC
as 20-1510
Petitioner: American Catalog Mailers Association, Association for Postal Commerce, Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers and others
Respondent: Postal Regulatory Commission
Oscar Dantzler v. DOJ, et al
as 20-5334
Defendant / Appellee: Agents One-Five, United States Department of Justice Office, Louisiana Commission of Human Rights Office of the Governor, Micheal McClananhan, Individually and in his capacity as the State of Louisiana President and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Oscar Dantzler
IN RE: JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES IN UNITED STATES V. STONE
as 1:2020mc00016
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROGER JASON STONE, JR.
In Re: JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES IN UNITED STATES V. STONE
Petitioner: MICHAEL CERNOVICH
Amicus Curiae: TULLY CENTER FOR FREE SPEECH, GANNETT CO., INC., INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSN. and others
Intervenor: JURORS
Angelene Hardaway, et al v. District of Columbia Housing
as 19-5277
Defendant / Appellee: District of Columbia, Frederick A. Douglas, District of Columbia Department of Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Lena Terrell Hardaway, DOES 1-5 and Angelene Hardaway
Juan Machado Amadis v. DOS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5088
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Justice and United States Department of State
Plaintiff / Appellant: Juan Luciano Machado Amadis
Amicus Curiae: Investigative Reporting Workshop, Reuters News & Media Inc., ProPublica and others
NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00745
Plaintiff: NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER and ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party: ROB RAWSON, ROSEMARIE HOWELL and TROY LAW, PLLC
Petitioner: JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, DON KOZICH, REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS and others
Amicus Curiae: ASSOCIATION OF ALTERNATIVE NEWS MEDIA, TULLY CENTER FOR FREE SPEECH, THOMAS BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim
USPS v. PRC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1297
Petitioner: United States Postal Service
Respondent: Postal Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: Valpak Direct Marketing Systems, Inc.
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: National Postal Policy Council, Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers, Association for Postal Commerce and others
Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers, et al v. PRC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1009
Petitioner: Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers, American Catalog Mailers Association, Association for Postal Commerce and others
Respondent: Postal Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent: United States Postal Service
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: American Forest & Paper Association
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers, American Catalog Mailers Association, Association for Postal Commerce and others
USPS v. PRC
as 14-1010
Petitioner: United States Postal Service
Respondent: Postal Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: American Forest & Paper Association
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers, American Catalog Mailers Association, Association for Postal Commerce and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?