Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05939
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv01593
Plaintiff:
Ms. Janet Sihler and Charlene Bavencoff
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
NFN et al v. Andrews
as 2:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Le'taxione NFN and MS
Defendant:
Heather Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGary et al v. Inslee et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Mr Darnell McGary and Ms Elizabeth McGary
Defendant:
Mr Jay Inslee, Susan Dryfus, Bob Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brandon v. Strange et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Myron Gaylord Brandon
Defendant:
Ms. Strange, Stephen Sinclair, Larry M Connels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yoon v. Ohio Security Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv01733
Plaintiff:
DDS Sung W Yoon and Sung W Yoon DDS, MS, PLLC doing business as Blooming Dental
Defendant:
Ohio Security Insurance Company and Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Rice v. Strange et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
John Valda Rice
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Melissa Andrewjeski, Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
