Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McNeal v. Hutchinson et al
as 2:2021cv03431
Plaintiff:
Timothy McNeal
Defendant:
Ms. J. Hutchinson, Mr. C. Nevils, Mr. Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eaglin v. McCall et al
as 0:2018cv03079
Defendant:
Ms. Charlene Toliver, Burrows, Dr. Woods and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Tyrell Eaglin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pigett v. Stokes et al
as 5:2017cv01489
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Pigett
Defendant:
Ms Stokes, Ms Stukes, Ms Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00287
Plaintiff:
Aryee Henderson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P Stirling, Michael McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Folk v. Stirling et al
as 9:2014cv03758
Plaintiff:
Courtney Folk
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Ann Hallman, Lt Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. Byars et al
as 0:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
Derick Lamont Singleton
Defendant:
William R Byars, Jr, John Doe I, Major Earley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pilcher v. Cartledge et al
as 2:2013cv02528
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Pilcher, Jr
Defendant:
Larry Cartledge, Megan Harris and Ms Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Cartledge et al
as 8:2013cv01656
Plaintiff:
Xavier Perry
Defendant:
Larry Cartledge, Florence Mauney, Captain Abston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Singleton v. Brown et al
as 1:2012cv02985
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Singleton
Defendant:
Administrative Food Service Brown, Administrative Food Service Argline, Mr Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ham v. Sly et al
as 6:2012cv02998
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ham
Defendant:
James Sly, Assistant Warden Nolan, Warden McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
