Cases 21 - 30 of 39
MTGLQ Investors, LP v. Manuel C. Roxas et al
as 8:2017cv02176
Defendant:
Emma Anderson, Does and Manuel C. Roxas
Plaintiff:
MTGLQ Investors, LP
MTGLQ Investors, LP v. Manuel C. Roxas et al
as 8:2017cv02080
Defendant:
Robert Anderson, Does and Manuel C. Roxas
Plaintiff:
MTGLQ Investors, LP
MTGLQ Investors, LP v. Manuel C. Roxas et al
as 8:2017cv01959
Defendant:
Does and Manuel C. Roxas
Plaintiff:
MTGLQ Investors, LP
MTGLQ Investors, LP v. Manuel C. Roxas et al
as 8:2017cv01826
Defendant:
Robert Anderson, Does and Manuel C. Roxas
Plaintiff:
MTGLQ Investors, LP
MTGLQ Investors, LP v. Ayala et al
as 5:2017cv05592
Plaintiff:
MTGLQ Investors, LP
Defendant:
Consuelo Ayala, Ivan Rocha Ayala and Rosalia Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Levi Lake v. Premier Financial Services Inc, et al
as 17-35759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVI A. LAKE, an individual
Defendant:
PREMIER FINANCIAL SERVICES INC
Defendant - Appellee:
MTGLQ INVESTORS LP, a Delaware limited partnership and OHIO SAVINGS BANK, a Delaware Corporation, AKA AmTrust Bank
MTGLQ Investors LP v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2017cv02706
Plaintiff:
MTGLQ Investors LP
Defendant:
United States Internal Revenue Service and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peralta v. MTC Financial , Inc
as 2:2017cv01684
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Bank of America, N.A., E-Trade Mortgage Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Stanford B Peralta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Lake v. Premier Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00495
Plaintiff:
Levi A. Lake
Defendant:
Premier Financial Services Inc and MTGLQ Investors LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wright v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2016cv05155
Plaintiff:
Beryl Ann Wright
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA , MTGLQ Investors LP , Quality Loan Service Corp of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
