Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Saul et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Roger Saul and Alma A Saul
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, Nationstar Mortgage LLC and MTGLQ Investors, LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fiedler et al v. Stacy et al
as 6:2023cv01958
Plaintiff:
Robert Fiedler and Muriel Fiedler
Defendant:
Judge Susan Stacy, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., MTGLQ Investors L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saul et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Roger Saul and Alma Saul
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and MTGLQ Investors, LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Hittner
as 22-20403
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wayne Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
David Hittner, MTGLQ Investors, L.P., Brandon Hakari and others
Smith v. Hittner et al
as 4:2021cv03079
Plaintiff:
Wayne Smith
Defendant:
David Hittner and MTGLQ Investors, LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scalercio-Isenberg v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company et al
as 1:2021cv04124
Plaintiff:
Sherry Scalercio-Isenberg
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company and MTGLQ Investors LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patricia Cowan v. MTGLQ Investors, LP, et al
as 12-11143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA DAVIDSON COWAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P., and their officers and directors, successors and/or assigns, stockholders and affiliates, LAW OFFICES OF SMITH, HIATT & DIAZ, P.A., and their officers and directors, successors and/or assigns, stockholders and affiliates, ROBERT A. SMITH and others
:
SERVICE
Cowan v. MTGLQ Investors, L.P. et al
as 2:2009cv00472
Plaintiff:
Patricia Davidson Cowan
Defendant:
MTGLQ Investors, L.P., The Law Offices of Smith, Hiatt & Diaz, P.A., Robert A. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
