Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Robert Andrew-Bey v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5069
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew-Bey
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland and Muriel Bowser
Allen v. Lovett et al
as 5:2022cv00282
Petitioner:
Duane C. Allen
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett, G.M. Alprin, Muriel Bowser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Duane C. Allen v. Muriel Bowser et al
as 5:2022cv00199
Petitioner:
Duane C. Allen
Respondent:
Muriel Bowser, District of Columbia Council and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Prince Jones v. DC, et al
as 21-5306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Prince Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia, Muriel Bowser, Todd Perkins and others
Jones v. True et al
as 1:2021cv02765
Petitioner:
Prince Jones
Respondent:
B. True, United States Attorney General, Attorney General for the District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv01696
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, TODD PERKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2021cv00878
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SMITH
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT, T. OUTLAW, O'DONOVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullin v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00082
Petitioner:
David John Mullin
Respondent:
United States of America and Muriel Bowser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CRUM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv03241
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
DAVID HALL CRUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02821
Defendant:
CLERK BRETT FRIEND, DAVID GROSSO, BRIANNE K. MADEAU and others
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
