Cases 11 - 20 of 21
QADR v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2014cv01443
Plaintiff:
NUR QADR
Defendant:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN, STEVEN GATES, TAMMY CESERINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2014cv00200
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, MURIN, MONGELLUZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forrest v. Overmeyer et al
as 3:2014cv00934
Plaintiff:
Michael Forrest
Defendant:
Michael Overmeyer, Michael Tice, Lt. Murin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURIN v. BRAY et al
as 2:2013cv01017
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. MURIN
Defendant:
JAY BRAY, HAROLD LEWIS, WESLEY R. EDENS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MURIN v. USA
as 2:2012cv01130
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ANDREW J. MURIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MOORE v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2012cv00177
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LATIK MOORE
Defendant:
DENNIS CLAYTON ADAMS, II, GILL, D.J. ROOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. BARONE et al
as 1:2011cv00256
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARONE, DEBRA SAUERS, JEFFREY BEARD and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINDELL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2011cv00173
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE TINDELL
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WENTEL, DEBRA SAUERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
KIRSCHNER et al v. WACHOVIA CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC et al
as 2:2009mc00162
Plaintiff:
MARC S. KIRSCHNER, COMPASS FINANCIAL CORPORATION and MB FINANCIAL BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
WACHOVIA CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CIT GROUP/EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
