Cases 1 - 10 of 103
HARVEY v. GEO AND ITS GUARDS et al
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
HAROLD HARVEY
Defendant:
GEO AND ITS GUARDS, MURPHY, MIKE SCHIDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittenburg v. Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Garrett Whittenburg
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Jarre H, Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTON v. PERDUE et al
as 1:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MOTON
Defendant:
ELAINE PERDUE, JODIE MURPHY, KRISTINE PRYOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DALLAL-RAWHI v. FELIX et al
as 1:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
FARHA DALLAL-RAWHI and FARHA, DALLAL-RAWHI DBA DALLAL RAWHI FARHA
Defendant:
PAUL A. FELIX, ANJUM AVA, DONALD LEE BUCKINGHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00152
Petitioner:
JAMES PATRICK MURPHY
Respondent:
T. RULE and FCI TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MOTON v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02134
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MOTON
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, ELAINE PERDUE, LISA HAMBLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. CARTER JR. et al
as 1:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
MURPHY EDWARDS
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS, DENNIS REAGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
