Cases 11 - 20 of 37
LECOCQ v. MURPHY
as 1:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
ANDREE LECOCQ
Defendant:
BRIAN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
MURPHY v. STATE OF N.C.
as 1:2022cv00441
Petitioner:
James L. Murphy
Respondent:
STATE OF N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLACK v. MURPHY
as 1:2021cv00618
Plaintiff:
MARY DILLON BLACK
Defendant:
TRACIE MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WISE et al v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00912
Intervenor Defendant:
JADE JUREK, ROSALYN KOCIEMBA, TOM KOCIEMBA and others
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY, DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., DANIEL BISHOP and others
Defendant:
KAREN BRINSON BELL, NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, JEFF CARMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. RANDOLPH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 1:2019cv00161
Respondent:
RANDOLPH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Petitioner:
KEAYONE LAMONT MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MURPHY v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01099
Plaintiff:
AMY MURPHY
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
CISNEROS v. NOVAN, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01066
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO CISNEROS
Defendant:
NOVAN, INC. , NATHAN STASKO , RICHARD D. PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
STEFANOWICZ v. NOVAN, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01015
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW STEFANOWICZ
Defendant:
NOVAN, INC. , NATHAN STASKO , RICHARD D. PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
MIRIYALA v. NOVAN, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00999
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MIRIYALA
Defendant:
NOVAN, INC. , NATHAN STASKO , RICHARD D. PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
HEBERT et al v. SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01390
Plaintiff:
JACQUEZ-RENE HEBERT , SARA BENSON , CAROL MURPHY and others
Defendant:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC. and RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
