Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Murphy v. USA
as 1:2012cv80440
Petitioner:
Damian Antonio Murphy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Murphy v. USA
as 1:2012cv80438
Petitioner:
Damian Antonio Murphy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Murphy v. BOP
as 7:2011cv00542
Respondent:
BOP
Petitioner:
Marian Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Murphy v. Aetna Insurance of Connecticut
as 3:2011cv00042
Defendant:
Aetna Insurance of Connecticut
Plaintiff:
Trina Murphy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Martins v. Akers et al
as 7:2011cv00252
Defendant:
Betty Akers, Mark Amonette, Dr. John Marsh and others
Plaintiff:
Oluyomi Martins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Halter v. Conover et al
as 7:2011cv00241
Defendant:
Nurse Diane Bolinger, Bruce Conover and Dr. Richard Murphy
Plaintiff:
Daniel Norbert Halter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Goff et al
as 6:2010cv00026
Defendant:
Carolyn Baker, Deborah Berkley, Bridges Treatment Center and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Murphy and Robert Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Murphy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2010cv00023
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Rashawn Murphy
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
The Historic Green Springs, Inc. et al v. United States Enviornmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2009cv00075
Plaintiff:
The Historic Green Springs, Inc., The Historic Green Springs, Inc., The Historic Green Springs, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States Enviornmental Protection Agency, Lisa P. Jackson, William C. Early and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
