Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Bright v. Corizon Health Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv00145
Plaintiff:
Micheal A. Bright
Defendant:
Corizon Health Corporation, Woodrow A. Myers, Scott Bower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullins v. Edenfield et al
as 4:2015cv00138
Plaintiff:
Angela Dawn Sullins
Defendant:
Troy Edenfield, Strojny, Solis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. United States Of America
as 4:2015cv00124
Plaintiff:
Tracy Marlene Myers
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Sullins v. Garden City Police Department et al
as 4:2015cv00101
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Sullins
Defendant:
Garden City Police Department, Troy Edenfield, Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. United States Of America
as 4:2013cv00221
Plaintiff:
Andre C. Myers
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Simmons v. Shaw et al
as 2:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
Richard Simmons
Defendant:
Kendall L. Shaw, FNU Lindsey, Mr. (FNU) Beverly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYERS v. HOLIDAY INN, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
GLYNDA MYERS
Defendant:
HOLIDAY INN, INC. , John Doe, ISLAND GROUP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sheppard et al v. Pierce County, Georgia et al
as 5:2012cv00136
Plaintiff:
Torrence Sheppard and Devontray Myers
Defendant:
Pierce County, Georgia, City of Blackshear, Georgia, Boyette Electric, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myers v. The United States of America
as 4:2012cv00167
Petitioner:
Andre Christopher Myers
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hammock v. Jolly et al
as 1:2012cv00027
Plaintiff:
Billy Nelson Hammock
Defendant:
Sheryl B. Jolly, Peter D. Johnson, Ann M. Vickery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
