Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jones v. Downstate Correctional Facilit
as 14-448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Maceo W. Jones
Defendant:
John Doe, for not acting fast enough when I was assaulted on Complex I G Unit (officer in charge), John Doe, when Red Dot was called he took too long to get there to help the other officer and John Doe, inmate who assaulted me at Downstate Correctional Facility
Defendant - Appellee:
Downstate Correctional Facility, Superintendent Perez, for not providing a safe enviornment, Richard Deustachio, Officer in Charge of Unit IG 8-4, Thomas O. Boyle, Code Red Officer and others
Jones v. Fischer
as 12-4060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Maceo W. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Brian Fischer
Jones v. Fischer
as 1:2012cv05853
Plaintiff:
Maceo W Jones
Defendant:
Brian Fischer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Downstate Correctional Facility Superintendent Perez et al
as 1:2012cv03340
Plaintiff:
Maceo W Jones
Defendant:
Downstate Correctional Facility Superintendent Perez and Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Downstate Correctional Facility (Supt Perez) et al
as 1:2012cv03307
Plaintiff:
Maceo W. Jones
Defendant:
Downstate Correctional Facility (Supt Perez) and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Downstate Correctional Facility (Supt Perez) et al
as 7:2012cv03307
Plaintiff:
Maceo W. Jones
Defendant:
Downstate Correctional Facility (Supt Perez) and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Superintendent Perez et al
as 1:2012cv03306
Plaintiff:
Maceo W. Jones
Defendant:
Superintendent Perez and Department of Mental Health (personal)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Devries et al
as 6:2009cv00130
Plaintiff:
Maceo W. Jones
Defendant:
Collin Devries and The Daily Mail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Snyder et al
as 9:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
Maceo W. Jones
Defendant:
Dave Snyder, Chad and Green County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
