Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Sambrano-Liljenquist et al v. LoHi Logistics, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Armando Sambrano-Liljenquist and Margarita Sambrano
Defendant:
LoHi Logistics, LLC, Jose Esau Reyes, BB Logistics & Delivery, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Pineda-Guzman v. Machuca Cruz et al
as 1:2020cv00180
Defendant:
Valentin Machua-Cruz, Auto Transportes Romedu S A DE C V and Valentin Machuca Cruz
Plaintiff:
Heber Pineda-Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maria Rubio-De Machuca, et al v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60282
Petitioner:
NELSON ANTONIO MACHUCA-RUBIO and MARIA CONSUELO RUBIO-DE MACHUCA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dolores Machuca v. Megan Brennan
as 20-50193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOLORES MACHUCA
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General and Chief Executive Officer, United States Postal Service
FILING ERROR
as 1:2019cv01155
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Norma Machuca Hernandez and Jose Luis Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Norma M. Hernandez, et al v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 5:2019cv01383
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Norma Machuca Hernandez and Jose Luis Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Machuca v. Gonzalez Carlos
as 3:2018cv00476
Petitioner:
Gonzalo Garcia Machuca
Respondent:
Marla Cecilia Gonzalez Carlos
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 9001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00046
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Machuca-Mendez v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv00562
Plaintiff:
Martha A Machuca-Mendez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Machuca-Secundino v. USA
as 5:2016cv00214
Petitioner:
Pastor Machuca-Secundino
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
