Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MACIAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2019cv00225
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: RAPHAEL LOPEZ MACIAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singh v. Macias et al
as 3:2016cv02509
Plaintiff: Lakhvir Singh
Defendant: Gabriel Macias and Nickabellas Trucking Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00214
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
MACIAS v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF ALLENTOWN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv03730
Plaintiff: JONATHAN MACIAS
Defendant: THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF ALLENTOWN , QUAAN S. WHITE, RICHARD E. GAVORNIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MACIAS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55791
Plaintiff: GONZALO MACIAS
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MACIAS v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54925
Plaintiff: THOMAS MACIAS
Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MACIAS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv52933
Plaintiff: JOSEPH MACIAS
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MACIAS et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv36305
Plaintiff: THOMAS MACIAS , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MACIAS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75977
Plaintiff: GONZALO MACIAS
Defendant: FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant: JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACIAS V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv34730
Plaintiff: THOMAS MACIAS
Defendant: UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?