Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Lyons #231703 et al v. Oakland County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 1:2015cv00186
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Lyons #231703, Dorian Delbertgerald Willis #225307, Yalaunda Butts and others
Defendant:
Oakland County Prosecutor's Office, Macomb County Prosecutor's Office, Wayne County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson et al v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2014cv14541
Plaintiff:
Victor Wilson, Dorian Willis and Tommy Farr
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Macomb, County of, Oakland, County of and others
Martin Solomon, et al v. Macomb County Corporation, et al
as 13-1148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN TONY SOLOMON
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
MACOMB COUNTY CORPORATION
Solomon et al v. Macomb County Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv14537
Plaintiff:
Martin Solomon and Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Macomb County Corporation, Sixteenth Judicial Circuit Court, Gus Harrison Correctional Facility and others
Bragg v. Macomb, County of et al
as 2:2012cv12198
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bragg
Defendant:
Macomb, County of, Fratarcangeli, Oster and others
Anderson v. Macomb County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2012cv12003
Plaintiff:
Ervin Anderson
Defendant:
Macomb County Sheriff Department and Medical Services Macomb County Sheriffs Department
Reiner v. Macomb County Jail et al
as 2:2012cv11213
Plaintiff:
Joseph Reiner
Defendant:
Macomb County Jail and Anthony Wickersham
Grabow et al v. Macomb, County of
as 2:2012cv10105
Plaintiff:
Kelli Ann Grabow and Kristina Prochnow
Defendant:
Macomb, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dolores Michales v. Mark Hackel
as 11-2446
Petitioner - Appellant:
DOLORES MICHALES
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK HACKEL, Macomb County Sheriff
Boniecki v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2011cv14824
Petitioner:
Teddy Boniecki
Respondent:
State of Michigan, Macomb, County of and 16th Circuit Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
