Cases 1 - 10 of 10
GRAY v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2016cv00232
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ERIN GRAY, SR
Defendant:
CORY W MARTIN, HOUSTON HEALTHCARE, BABATUNDE FAGIMAYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. XANDERS et al
as 5:2015cv00333
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SMITH
Defendant:
SAM XANDERS, STATE OF GEORGIA, MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARSWELL v. BARTRAM et al
as 5:2015cv00177
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CARSWELL
Defendant:
BARTRAM and MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HORN v. MACON et al
as 5:2014cv00364
Plaintiff:
DEEANN HORN
Defendant:
CITY OF MACON , MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT , MACON BIBB COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelsey v. Macon Judicial Circuit et al
as 1:2013cv00924
Plaintiff:
Kameron Kelsey
Defendant:
Macon Judicial Circuit, Macon Police Department, State of Georgia and others
CULLER v. MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 5:2012cv00373
Petitioner:
GABE LOCKETT CULLER
Respondent:
MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EASLEY v. MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2012cv00148
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO EASLEY
Defendant:
MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT , MACON GEORGIA , ANTOINE JORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CULLER v. BIBB COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 5:2011cv00492
Plaintiff:
GABE LOCKETT CULLER
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT and BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill et al v. Macon Police Department et al
as 5:2010cv00472
Plaintiff:
Tony Hill, Sr. and Tony Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Macon Police Department , City of Macon , Officer Antoinne Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. Department of Family and Children Services et al
as 5:2008cv00162
Plaintiff:
Alex Harris and Alex Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Family and Children Services, State of Georgia, City of Macon and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
