Cases 1 - 10 of 62
McCaulley v. Madison County Jail Infirmary
as 5:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scott McCaulley, SR
Defendant:
Madison County Jail Infirmary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOVE v. MOORE et al
as 3:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK DOVE
Defendant:
SHERIFF MICHAEL MOORE and MADISON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOVE, et al v. MADISON COUNTY JAIL, et al
as 3:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK DOVE, MASON DEAN and RONALD GLEEN RICE
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY JAIL and SHERIFF MICHAEL MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. WHITE et al
as 3:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
BRYAN O'NEIL WHITE
Defendant:
D PARKS WHITE, JEFF C LEE, ALICE BUTTONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOVE v. MADISON COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK DOVE
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnold v. Kilby Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Renaldo Arnold
Defendant:
Kilby Correctional Facility, Classification Department, Social Services and others
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hobbs v. Madison County Jail
as 5:2021cv01518
Plaintiff:
Darwin V Hobbs, Jr
Defendant:
Madison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Madison County Jail
as 5:2021cv01321
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Renaldo Arnold
Defendant:
Madison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyson v. Madison County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv00841
Plaintiff:
Milton Tyson, Jr
Defendant:
Kimbles Food Comp, MCIC Phone Company and Madison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Madison County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv00812
Defendant:
Madison County Jail, Kevin Turner, Officer Byrd and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lewis Taylor, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
