Cases 1 - 5 of 5
A.M. v. Indianapolis Public Schools, et al
as 22-2332
Plaintiff / Appellee:
A. M., by her mother and next friend, E.M.
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS and SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS, in her official capacity
Intervenor:
STATE OF INDIANA
Amicus Curiae:
INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER, RILEY GAINES, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
A.M. v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS et al
as 1:2022cv01075
Plaintiff:
A.M.
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS and SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Amicus Curiae:
Selina Soule, Madison Kenyon, Cynthia Monteleone and others
Material Witne:
IHSAA
Intervenor:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lindsay Hecox, et al v. Bradley Little, et al
as 20-35813
Defendant / Appellant:
INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOISE CITY, # 1; in thier official capacities, COBY DENNIS, in his official capapcity as superintendent of the Independent School District of Boise City #1, MARLENE TROMP, in her official capacity as President of Boise State University and others
Intervenor:
MARY MARSHALL and MADISON KENYON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE, with her next friends Jean Doe and John Doe and LINDSAY HECOX
Lindsay Hecox, et al v. Madison Kenyon, et al
as 20-35815
Not Yet Classified:
MARY MARSHALL and MADISON KENYON
Defendant:
INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE IDAHO CODE COMMISSION, in their official capacities, BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY, INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, in their official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE, with her next friends Jean Doe and John Doe and LINDSAY HECOX
Hecox, et al. v. Little, et al.
as 1:2020cv00184
Defendant:
Bradley Little, Boise State University, Individual Members of the State Board of Education and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Lindsay Hecox
Intervenor:
Madison Kenyon and Mary Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
