Cases 1 - 9 of 9
El-Bey v. Officers of the Clerk et al
as 1:2024cv01617
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Officers of the Clerk, All Employees, Official Administrators and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Copperthite
as 1:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
Samuel A. Lyons
Defendant:
US Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Johnson v. Day et al
as 1:2023cv02962
Plaintiff:
Maurice Albert Johnson
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day, Judge Peter J. Messitte, John Chamble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. BOCSE McGuire, Esq. et al
as 1:2023cv01317
Plaintiff:
Jermall Brown
Defendant:
BOCSE McGuire, Esq., Martin / Administrative Agency, Magistrate Sumlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Judicial Council for Fourth Circuit et al
as 1:2021cv00537
Plaintiff:
Lamar A. Williams
Defendant:
Judicial Council for Fourth Circuit, District of Maryland; Department of Injustice, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03353
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03535
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hurt v. United States Magistrate Judge, Janet E. King et al
as 8:2012cv03675
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
United States Magistrate Judge, Janet E. King and United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Bankruptcy, Magistrate Judges, and Marshals Appointments
as 1:1999mc00750
Plaintiff:
In re: Bankruptcy, Magistrate Judges, and Marshals Appointments
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
