Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MARTIN et al v. MCCORKLE et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MARTIN
Defendant:
T. MCCORKLE, CONYERS, D. REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCUTERI
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MAILROOM STAFF, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KREILEIN v. UNIDENTIFIED MAILROOM EMPLOYEES (DAVIDSON) et al
as 1:2022cv02071
Plaintiff:
ALAN KREILEIN
Defendant:
UNIDENTIFIED MAILROOM EMPLOYEES (DAVIDSON), KENNEDY, C. SANFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Sonnenberg et al
as 3:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Carl Johnson and Robert Carl Johnson
Defendant:
Sonnenberg, Warden, Aramark and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. WALLACE et al
as 2:2019cv00560
Defendant:
AMBER WALLACE, MAILROOM STAFF, BRENDA TREMBLE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillis v. Sevier et al
as 3:2018cv00274
Plaintiff:
Brandon Tillis
Defendant:
Mark Sevier, Ms Guitterrez and Westville Correctional Facility Mailroom
Miscellaneous_party:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANHORN et al v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2014cv00275
Defendant:
ALL MAILROOM EMPLOYEES, HARLEY CRABB, TROY KEITH and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL CHIVERS and WILLIAM VANHORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frohwerk v. Bean et al
as 2:2011cv00209
Plaintiff:
David Frohwerk
Defendant:
Timothy Bean, Unknown Mailroom employee(s) of the Indiana Dept of Corrections at the Westville Correctional Facility and Westville Correctional Facility Counselors John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
