Cases 31 - 40 of 46
George Bartz v. Maggie Miller-Stout, et al
as 13-35380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE BARTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT, INMATE BANKING AND MAILROOM STAFF, JANE DOES 1-15 and others
Reed v. Byrnes et al
as 2:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reed
Defendant:
Donna Byrnes, Garvin, Rebecca Dyson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seavon Pierce v. Fernando Gonzales, et al
as 13-15114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
FERNANDO GONZALES, Warden, DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS, MAILROOM STAFF and others
LaTanya Cramer v. Nunez et al
as 2:2013cv00214
Plaintiff:
LaTanya Cramer
Defendant:
Lieutenant Mailroom, Mailroom Staff, Captain Nunez and others
Usrey v. Deyott et al
as 6:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joe Usrey
Defendant:
Denise Deyott, Mike Ferriter and Montana State Prison Mailroom Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Parks v. Wren et al
as 5:2012cv01353
Defendant:
All Mailroom Staffs, Tom Brody, Stephen Casey and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Parks
Owen Lino v. J. Kellerman, et al
as 11-57193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWEN LINO
Defendant - Appellee:
J. KELLERMAN, Facility Captain, J. T. OCHOA, Chief Deputy Warden, G. J. JANDA, Associate Warden and others
Owen Lino v. J. Kellerman, et al
as 11-57092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWEN LINO
Defendant - Appellee:
J. KELLERMAN, Facility Captain, J. T. OCHOA, Chief Deputy Warden, G. J. JANDA, Associate Warden and others
Tyrone Rogers v. G. Giurbino, et al
as 11-56961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
G. J. GIURBINO, Director, Division of Adult Operation, URIBE DOMINGO, Jr., Acting Warden, N. GRANNIS, Chief Inmate Appeals Branch and others
Owen Lino v. J. Kellerman, et al
as 11-56273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWEN LINO
Defendant - Appellee:
J. KELLERMAN, Facility Captain, J. T. OCHOA, Chief Deputy Warden, G. J. JANDA, Associate Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
