Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund v. Akima LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01926
Defendant:
Akima Facilities Operations, LLC, Akima LLC doing business as Akima LLC Labor Relations, Sunik, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund v. Grace Medical Center, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund
Defendant:
Grace Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund v. Terra Klean Solutions
as 1:2022cv02667
Plaintiff:
Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund
Defendant:
Terra Klean Solutions
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund v. Unique Cleaning Service, Inc
as 1:2020cv02203
Plaintiff:
Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund
Defendant:
Unique Cleaning Service, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
In re ACTOS Antitrust Litigati
as 20-1994
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Crosby Tugs, LLC, Meijer, Inc., Painters District Council No. 30 Health and Welfare Fund, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuitcals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company v. United Food and Commercial Wor
as 20-481
Respondent:
NECA-IBEW Welfare Trust Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly sitiated, A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Buildings Trade Welfare Plan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund and others
Petitioner:
Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda Pharmaceuitcals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund v. The Principle Group
as 8:2019cv01092
Plaintiff:
Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund
Defendant:
The Principle Group (United States Holocaust Museum) and The Principle Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Walgreen Co. et al v. Wyeth, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv08965
Plaintiff:
Meijer Distribution Inc., PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Defendant:
WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS INC, WYETH, INC., WYETH LLC and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
APOTEX CORP.
In Re:
Effexor XR Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party:
A.F. of L. -- AGC Building Trades Welfare Plan
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust
as 19-754
Plaintiff:
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council 21 Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, HEB Grocery Company L.P., Minnesota and North Dakota Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Health Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Teva Women's Health, Inc., FKA Duramed Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Barr Laboratories Inc., a Delaware Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Pipefitters Union Local NO 537 Health & Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, AGC-International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Welfare Plan of the International Union of Operation Engineers Locals 137, 137A, 137B, 137C, 137R, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Appellant:
People of the State of California
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., an Israeli Corporation
Walgreen Co. et al v. Wyeth, Inc. et al
as 0:2019mc60417
Plaintiff:
Meijer Distribution Inc., IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Apotex Corp.
Defendant:
Wyeth LLC, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth-Whitehall Pharmaceuticals and others
In Re:
Effexor XR Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
