Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Marks v. Parsons, Kansas, City of et al
as 2:2025cv02617
Plaintiff:
Paul Marks
Defendant:
Parsons, Kansas, City of, Connor Eichinger, Christian Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cloud v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2022cv03210
Plaintiff:
Sharon Cloud
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Richard N. Raleigh, Mandi Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ebeling-Dearing v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2022cv02373
Plaintiff:
Mandy Ebeling-Dearing
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cloud v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2022cv03146
Plaintiff:
Sharon Cloud
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Mandi Stephenson, Richard N. Raleigh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hanten v. Tippie et al
as 5:2021cv03089
Defendant:
David Groves, Lisa (lnu), Michelle Tippie and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Hanten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waterman v. Board of Commissioners of Cherokee County, Kansas et al
as 5:2020cv03320
Defendant:
David Groves, Beau Hamlin, Michelle Tippie and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Waterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hasenbank v. Gronniger et al
as 5:2020cv04082
Defendant:
Don Gronniger, Mandy Jone and Dan Gronniger
Plaintiff:
Heather Hasenback and Heather Hasenbank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Flannigan et al
as 5:2020cv03225
Defendant:
Kathy S. Hill, Sarah Canty, Kathryn H. Vratil and others
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
