Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
United States v. Nunez-Romero
as 23-2034
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MILTON MANUEL NUNEZ-ROMERO
United States v. Nunez-Romero
as 23-2033
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MILTON MANUEL NUNEZ-ROMERO
Ohio Gravy Biscuit, Inc. v. U.S. National Bank Association et al
as 5:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Ohio Gravy Biscuit, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. National Bank Association, United States, Terese M. Romero and others
Not Yet Classified:
Michael B. Thurman
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Romero
as 3:2022cv02067
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Manuel A Romero and Manuel A. Romero
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
OCampo Romero v. Progressive Management Services, LLC.
as 1:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Progressive Management Services, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Felix M OCampo Romero and Felix Manuel OCampo Romero
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Victor Chavez-Romero, et al v. United States Attorney General
as 19-10971
Petitioner:
KATHERIN YESSENIA CHAVEZ-ROMERO and VICTOR MANUEL CHAVEZ-ROMERO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Romero et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv14825
Plaintiff:
Gloria R. Romero and Manuel H. Romero
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02518
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
