Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Soto v. Maldonado
as 3:2023cv50362
Petitioner:
Carlos Gutierrez Soto and Marcos Alvarez Lopez
Respondent:
R Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
ALVAREZ v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09286
Plaintiff:
MARCOS ALVAREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lopez-Martinez et al v. Villa-Bernal et al
as 1:2021cv00652
Plaintiff:
Salatiel Lopez-Martinez, Marco Martinez, Adalia Rodriguez-Lopez and others
Defendant:
Gerardo Villa-Bernal, PR Holdings LP and PR Holdings GP, LLC
Cross Defendant:
J Berkman Restaurant LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ALVAREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv12713
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARCOS ALVAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation v. Alvarez et al
as 8:2020cv00474
Plaintiff:
New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation
Defendant:
Marco Alvarez, George Basquez Vargas, Olivia Basquez Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALVAREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv05622
Plaintiff:
MARCO ALVAREZ
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alvarez-Garcia v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00057
Petitioner:
Marcos Alvarez-Garcia
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Marco Alvarez-Acevedo
as 17-30230
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCO ALVAREZ-ACEVEDO
USA v. Marcos Alvarez-Garcia
as 17-41169
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCOS ALVAREZ-GARCIA
Isabel Alvarez v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00972
Plaintiff:
Isabel Alvarez and Marco Alvarez
Defendant:
Does and Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
