Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ford v. Wiley et al
as 5:2025cv01525
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ford
Defendant:
Anastasia Wiley, Don Reading, Colby Rison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Wiley et al
as 1:2025cv01525
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ford
Defendant:
Anastasia Wiley, Don Reading, Colby Rison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08979
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv41767
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv03828
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACEVEDO et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03212
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DINGUS, DESMOND DAVIS, DENNIS ROTHERY and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
EDWARDS et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03218
Plaintiff:
STEFAN FLOYD, RICHARD FERREIRA, ERIC ESCOBAR and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edwards et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02187
Plaintiff:
Stefan Floyd, Richard Ferreira, Eric Escobar and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo, LLC, Does 1-50 and others
Acevedo et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02140
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dingus, Desmond Davis, Dennis Rothery and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
