Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 79
Lorillard, Inc., et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Admin., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5226
Plaintiff - Appellee: Lorillard, Inc., Lorillard Tobacco Company and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
Defendant - Appellant: United States Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Sylvia Mathews Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Sandoz, Incorporated v. Sylvia Burwell
as 14-1922
Plaintiff: HOSPIRA, INCORPORATED
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant: SANDOZ INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee: SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, DR. MARGARET HAMBURG, Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug and UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee: MYLAN INSTITUTIONAL LLC and PAR STERILE PRODUCTS, LLC
Hospira, Incorporated v. Sylvia Burwell
as 14-1920
Plaintiff - Appellant: HOSPIRA, INCORPORATED
Intervenor/Plaintiff: SANDOZ INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee: SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, DR. MARGARET HAMBURG, Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug and UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee: MYLAN INSTITUTIONAL LLC and PAR STERILE PRODUCTS, LLC
Hospira, Inc. et al v. Burwell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv02662
Plaintiff: Hospira, Inc.
Defendant: Sylvia Mathews Burwell , Margaret Hamburg and Food and Drug Administration
Intervenor_defendant: Mylan Institutional LLC and Par Sterile Products, LLC
Intervenor_plaintiff: Sandoz Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Physicians for Integrity in Medical Research Inc v. Margaret Hamburg
as 2:2014cv00755
Defendant: Margaret Hamburg
Plaintiff: Physicians for Integrity in Medical Research Inc
Physicians for Integrity v. Margaret Hamburg
as 13-73032
Petitioner: PHYSICIANS FOR INTEGRITY IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, INC.
Respondent: MARGARET HAMBURG, Commissioner of Food and Drug Administration
Kummerow v. US Food and Drug Administration et al
as 2:2013cv02180
Plaintiff: Fred Kummerow
Defendant: US Food and Drug Administration, Margaret Hamburg, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Tummino v. Hamburg
as 13-1690
Plaintiff - Appellee: Annie Tummino, in her individual capacity, as Vice- Chair of the Women's Liberation Birth Control Project as Coordinator of the Morning-After Pill Conspiracy, and on behalf of women who need Emergency Contraception, Erin T. Mahoney, in her individual capacity, as Chair of the Women's Liberation Birth Control Project as Coordinator of the Morning- After Pill Conspiracy, and on behalf of women who need Emergency Contraception, Carol Giardina, in her individual capacity, as Coordinator of the Women's Liberation Birth Control Project as Coordinator of the Morning-After Pill Conspiracy, and on behalf of women who need Emergency Contraception and others
Intervenor: Teva Women's Health, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: Margaret Hamburg, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration and Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
Compassion Over Killing et al v. Food and Drug Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01385
Plaintiff: Compassion Over Killing , Animal Legal Defense Fund , Elizabeth Barrett and others
Defendant: Food and Drug Administration , Margaret Hamburg , Agriculture Marketing Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
K-V Pharmaceutical Company, et al v. FDA, et al
as 12-5349
Plaintiff - Appellant: K-V Pharmaceutical Company and Ther-RX Corporation
Defendant - Appellee: United States Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Margaret Hamburg, M.D. - Commissioner of Food and Drugs and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?