Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00670
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv03530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rodriguez et al v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority et al
as 3:2024cv01578
Plaintiff:
Hector Cardona, Edwin Lozada, Juan Santiago and others
Defendant:
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, Doriel Pagan-Crespo and Ainez Medina-Resto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FILING ERROR
as 5:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Anna Maria Luna
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Luna v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Anna Maria Luna
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Erika King et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05008
Plaintiff:
Erika King, Nona King, William King and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
King et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
Erika King, Nona King, William King and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
King et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00812
Plaintiff:
King, Erika King, Nona King and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
