Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Harvey v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv01123
Plaintiff:
Javonte Alexander Harvey
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Durango Jail and Maricopa County Towers Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv00978
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Towers Jail and Maricopa County Durango Jail
Plaintiff:
Arthur J Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Maricopa County Durango Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00979
Plaintiff:
Steven Wade Ray
Defendant:
Maricopa County Durango Jail, Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Towers Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Maricopa County Durango Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00977
Defendant:
Maricopa County Durango Jail, Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Towers Jail
Plaintiff:
Anthony Valero Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beard v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv00696
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Towers Jail
Plaintiff:
Gregory Deatrick Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levels v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv00458
Plaintiff:
Krey M Levels
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Food Services, Correctional Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davids v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2013cv02654
Plaintiff:
Brant Gregory Davids
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Towers Jail and Joseph M Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monk v. Gissels et al
as 2:2013cv02392
Plaintiff:
Justen Kofi Monk
Defendant:
Unknown Gissels, Maricopa County Towers Jail, Mesa, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miel v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2013cv02125
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Miel
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Maricopa County Towers Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Udila v. Maricopa County Towers Jail
as 2:2013cv01993
Plaintiff:
Radu Udila
Defendant:
Maricopa County Towers Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
