Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00215
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robinson v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 4:2021cv03870
Plaintiff:
Mary Robinson
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Robinson v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv00622
Plaintiff:
Shamika Marie Robinson
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Barry v. Freshour et al
as 4:2017cv01403
Plaintiff:
Gene N Barry
Defendant:
Scott M Freshour, Belinda West, Mari Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zadeh v. Pease et al
as 4:2017cv00219
Defendant:
Sharon Pease, Belinda West, Mari Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zadeh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2016cv01000
Defendant:
Beth Bierman, Juanita Garner, Mari Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Arnold J. Morris, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Cotropia v Mary Chapman, et al
as 4:2016cv00742
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cotropia
Defendant:
Mary Chapman, Texas Medical Board, Members of the Texas Medical Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Zadeh et al v. Robinson et al
as 1:2015cv00598
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Dr. Joseph A. Zadeh
Defendant:
Kara Kirby, Sharon Pease and Mari Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Applicant 1626, MD v. Robinson et al
as 1:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
Applicant 1626, MD
Defendant:
Manager of Licensing Antonia Knight, National Practitioner Data Bank and Executive Director Mari Robinson
Notice Only Party:
Ted A. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Pena v. Texas Medical Board et al
as 5:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Francisco I. Pena
Defendant:
Texas Medical Board , Roberta M. Kalafut , Keith Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
