Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
MARINELLI v. CITIBANK, N.A.
as 2:2022cv07023
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE MARINELLI
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
MARINELLI v. SORBER et al
as 2:2022cv02401
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS MARINELLI
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT JAIME SORBER, MAJOR TERRA, DEPUTY SIPPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARINELLI et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05215
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. MARINELLI, TEDOR DAVIDO, MELVIN KNIGHT and others
Defendant:
JOHN E WETZEL, GEORGE M LITTLE, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORAN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv04720
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
IDA MORAN and THE ESTATE OF MARY MARINELLI
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATERMAN v. Nielsen Holdings plc et al
as 2:2021cv00319
Defendant:
David Rawlinson, JONATHAN MILLER, Nancy Tellem and others
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Oram v. Nielsen Holdings PLC et al
as 1:2021cv00067
Defendant:
James A. Attwood Jr., David Rawlinson, Karen M. Hoguet and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Oram
Mountain Lakes Abstract Co. Inc. et al v. Lloyd's of London et al
as 3:2020cv01484
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Fiers, Scott M. Marinelli, Jennifer J. Fiers and others
Defendant:
Lloyd's of London
Counter Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Counter Defendant:
Robert Casper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUFFIELD v. LEGEND SPINE, LLC et al
as 5:2019cv03760
Defendant:
STEVEN MARINELLI, ARGOVIAN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, DR. CHRISTOPHER WAGENER and others
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN DUFFIELD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
