Cases filed in Arkansas
Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Recinos-Mancia v. USA
as 5:2014cv05355
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Mario Alberto Recinos-Mancia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sims v. Adams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00405
Plaintiff: Mario A Sims
Defendant: Edward Adams and Sharell Deberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galvez et al v. Pacheco et al
as 5:2014cv05298
Plaintiff: Leonel Ferrer and Jenffer Galvez
Defendant: Mario Pacheco, Juan Pacheco, Leticia Pacheco and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chasko et al v. Walgreen Co.
as 5:2013cv05191
Plaintiff: Christine Chasko , Byron Banks , Matthew Barrett and others
Defendant: Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Riffey et al v. CRST Expedited Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00294
Plaintiff: David Michael Riffey and Beren Riffey
Defendant: CRST Expedited Inc , Mario Acevedo Becerra , John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Bennett v. Hobbs We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00368
Plaintiff: Mario Bennett
Defendant: Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vanpelt v. Love et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00293
Plaintiff: Mario Vanpelt
Defendant: B Love, R Edwards, Mark Cashion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckner v. Helder We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv05152
Plaintiff: Michael Mario Buckner
Defendant: Tim Helder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Hobbs We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00252
Plaintiff: Mario Scott
Defendant: Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Juarez-Reyes v. USA
as 5:2012cv05042
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Mario Juarez-Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?